How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Hi-X65 vs AONIC 50 GEN 2

Austrian Audio Hi-X65 vs Shure AONIC 50 GEN 2

What Hi-X65 does better (3) and where AONIC 50 GEN 2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Austrian Audio Hi-X65
Austrian Audio · 2021Hi-X65
3 advantages≈ $290
vs
Shure AONIC 50 GEN 2
Shure · 2023AONIC 50 GEN 2
8.2Score
1 advantage≈ $340
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls7.8

Why is Hi-X65 better than AONIC 50 GEN 2?

  1. Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
  2. Weight310 g vs 334 g+8%
  3. Highest frequency28,000 Hz vs 22,000 Hz+27%

Why is AONIC 50 GEN 2 better than Hi-X65?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Hi-X65: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-ear—
Ear cup designOpen-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—50 mm
Lowest frequency5 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency28,000 Hz22,000 Hz
Impedance25 Ω39 Ω
Sensitivity110 dB98 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—45 h
Connectivity
WirelessNoYes
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—Yes
LDAC—Yes
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight310 g334 g
Foldable—Yes
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare