vs
2.4Battery6.0
Why is ATH-WB2022 better than Solitaire T?
- Highest frequency45,000 Hz vs 22,000 Hz2×
- LDACYes · Solitaire T: No
Why is Solitaire T better than ATH-WB2022?
- Battery life9 h vs 40 h4.4×
- aptXNo · ATH-WB2022: Yes
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 4 Hz+25%
- Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 45 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 4 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 45,000 Hz | 22,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 47 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 106 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Microphones | — | 4 |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 40 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 770 mAh |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | No | Yes |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 350 g | — |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
