vs
9.8Sound9.8
2.3Battery7.0
Why is ATH-WB2022 better than FreeBuds Pro 5?
- Driver size45 mm vs 11 mm4.1×
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 10 Hz2×
Why is FreeBuds Pro 5 better than ATH-WB2022?
- Charging time2.5 h vs 1 h2.5×
- Bluetooth version5.1 vs 6+18%
- Highest frequency45,000 Hz vs 48,000 Hz+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 45 mm | 11 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 2 |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 10 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 45,000 Hz | 48,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 47 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 106 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 9 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 6 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 38 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 60 mAh |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 1 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 350 g | — |
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 5.5 g |
| Protection rating | — | IP57 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Audio Technica ATH-WB2022vsHifiMan HE1000 Unveiled
vsMeze Empyrean IIvsAudio Technica ATH-WB2022vs
Audio Technica ATH-WB2022vsAustrian Audio The Composer
vsHifiMan HE1000SEvsAudio Technica ATH-WB2022
vs
Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5vsHuawei FreeBuds Pro 49.36.8
vsBose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)vsHuawei FreeBuds Pro 54.89.3