vs
2.4Battery8.3
Why is ATH-WB2022 better than H9?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · H9: No
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
- Highest frequency45,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2.2×
- LDACYes · H9: No
- Driver size45 mm vs 40 mm+12%
Why is H9 better than ATH-WB2022?
- Battery life9 h vs 75 h8.3×
- Bluetooth version5.1 vs 5.4+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 45 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 45,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 47 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 106 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 75 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 45 h |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 350 g | — |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
