vs
4.0Battery5.0
Why is ATH-TWX9 better than CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1: No
- Earbud weight (each)5.4 g vs 12 g2.2×
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 21,000 Hz+90%
Why is CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1 better than ATH-TWX9?
- Battery life6.5 h vs 7 h+8%
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 5 Hz2×
- Charging time2.5 h vs 1.5 h+67%
- Driver size5.8 mm vs 7 mm+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | 7 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 21,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB | 107 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6.5 h | 7 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 6 h | — |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.4 g | 12 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Audio Technica ATH-TWX9vsAudio Technica ATH-TWX75.56.9
vsBose QuietComfort Earbuds IIvsAudio Technica ATH-TWX95.75.5vs
Audio Technica ATH-TWX9vsfinal ZE80005.55.4vs
Audio Technica ATH-TWX9vsGeemarc CL7370vs
Audio Technica ATH-TWX9vsEarFun Free 2S
vs
Apple AirPods 3vsSennheiser CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1