How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. ATH-SQ1TW2NC vs WAVE FLEX 3

Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NC vs JBL WAVE FLEX 3

What ATH-SQ1TW2NC does better (2) and where WAVE FLEX 3 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NC
Audio Technica · 2026ATH-SQ1TW2NC
8.1Score
2 advantages≈ $65
Higher score
vs
JBL WAVE FLEX 3
JBL · 2026WAVE FLEX 3
7.6Score
5 advantages≈ $60
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
4.5Battery7.3
9.1Build & features5.7

Why is ATH-SQ1TW2NC better than WAVE FLEX 3?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
  2. Earbud weight (each)4 g vs 4.4 g+10%

Why is WAVE FLEX 3 better than ATH-SQ1TW2NC?

  1. Battery life7.5 h vs 10 h+33%
  2. Driver size5.8 mm vs 12 mm2.1×
  3. Battery life with ANC6 h vs 7 h+17%
  4. Bluetooth version5.2 vs 6+15%
  5. Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL WAVE FLEX 3JBL WAVE FLEX 3≈ $607.6
Sound
FitIn-earOpen-ear
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size5.8 mm12 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity98 dB96 dB
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life7.5 h10 h
Battery life with ANC6 h7 h
Charging time2.5 h2 h
Wireless charging (case)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.26
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4 g4.4 g
Protection ratingIPX5IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx4
Dust protection (IP)—5
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare