vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
4.6Battery3.4
9.2Build & features6.3
Why is ATH-SQ1TW2NC better than ZE300 for ASMR 3D?
- Battery life7.5 h vs 5.5 h+36%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
Why is ZE300 for ASMR 3D better than ATH-SQ1TW2NC?
- Charging time2.5 h vs 1.5 h+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7.5 h | 5.5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 6 h | — |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4 g | 4 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörervs
Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsSoundcore R50i NCvs
Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsradius Hear-scape HP-H300BTvs
Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsEdifier W260NC8.28.1vs
Rick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörervsfinal ZE300 for ASMR 3DvsSoundcore R50i NCvsfinal ZE300 for ASMR 3D