How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. ATH-S300BT vs ULT Wear

Audio Technica ATH-S300BT vs Sony ULT Wear

What ATH-S300BT does better (3) and where ULT Wear wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Audio Technica ATH-S300BT
Audio Technica · 2024ATH-S300BT
9.5Score
3 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
vs
Sony ULT Wear
Sony · 2024ULT Wear
6.3Score
1 advantage≈ $95
7.8Noise control & calls7.8
9.3Battery4.7

Why is ATH-S300BT better than ULT Wear?

  1. Battery life90 h vs 50 h+80%
  2. Battery life with ANC60 h vs 30 h2×
  3. Charging time2.5 h vs 3.5 h+40%

Why is ULT Wear better than ATH-S300BT?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 5 Hz4×
Specifications

Side by side

Sony ULT WearSony ULT Wear≈ $956.3
Sound
Fit—Over-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz5 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance44 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity103 dB110 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life90 h50 h
Battery life with ANC60 h30 h
Charging time2.5 h3.5 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15.2
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight258 g255 g
FoldableYesYes
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare