Why is ATH-R50x better than Solo 4?
- Weight207 g vs 217 g+5%
Why is Solo 4 better than ATH-R50x?
Solo 4 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 50 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 93 dB | — |
| Spatial / 3D audio | — | Yes |
| Head tracking | — | Yes |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 50 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 10 min → 5 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.3 |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| USB audio | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 207 g | 217 g |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
