Why is ATH-HL7BT better than ULT Wear?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · ULT Wear: No
- Charging time1.5 h vs 3.5 h2.3×
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
- LDACYes · ULT Wear: No
- Weight220 g vs 255 g+16%
- Driver size53 mm vs 40 mm+32%
Why is ULT Wear better than ATH-HL7BT?
- Battery life20 h vs 50 h2.5×
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 53 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 48 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 110 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | 50 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 30 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 3.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 220 g | 255 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Audio Technica ATH-HL7BTvsBose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones
vsBowers & Wilkins PX7 S2evsAudio Technica ATH-HL7BT5.56.2
vsJBL Live 780NCvsAudio Technica ATH-HL7BT6.86.2
vsBeats Studio ProvsAudio Technica ATH-HL7BT5.66.2
vsJBL JR460 NCvsAudio Technica ATH-HL7BT6.26.2
vsHifiMan HE400SEvsAudio Technica ATH-HL7BT