vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
9.1Battery8.4
7.3Build & features8.4
Why is ATH-CKS50TW2 better than Push ANC Active S2PAW-S749?
- Battery life25 h vs 12 h2.1×
- Battery life with ANC15 h vs 7 h2.1×
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
Why is Push ANC Active S2PAW-S749 better than ATH-CKS50TW2?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx7+40%
- Driver size9 mm vs 12 mm+33%
- Dust protection (IP)5 vs 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 9 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 20 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 110 dB | 99 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 25 h | 12 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 15 h | 7 h |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LC3, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 105 g |
| Earbud weight (each) | 7.2 g | — |
| Protection rating | IP55 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | 6 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
JBL Live Flex 3vsAudio Technica ATH-CKS50TW29.19.1
vsJBL Live Buds 3vsAudio Technica ATH-CKS50TW29.19.1
vsJBL Live Beam 3vsAudio Technica ATH-CKS50TW29.29.1vs
Audio Technica ATH-CKS50TW2vsSoundcore Sleep A209.19.1
vsFairphone FairbudsvsAudio Technica ATH-CKS50TW2vs
Audio Technica ATH-CKS50TW2vsradius Hear-scape Beethoven HP-B100BT