vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
9.1Battery9.2
Why is ATH-CKS50TW2 better than FoKus H-ANC?
- Battery life25 h vs 13 h+92%
Why is FoKus H-ANC better than ATH-CKS50TW2?
- Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
- Driver size9 mm vs 10 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Hybrid |
| Driver size | 9 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 20 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 110 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 25 h | 13 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 15 h | — |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 2 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LC3, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 7.2 g | — |
| Protection rating | IP55 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
JBL Live Flex 3vsAudio Technica ATH-CKS50TW29.19.1
vsJBL Live Buds 3vsAudio Technica ATH-CKS50TW29.19.1
vsJBL Live Beam 3vsAudio Technica ATH-CKS50TW29.29.1vs
Audio Technica ATH-CKS50TW2vsSoundcore Sleep A209.19.1
vsFairphone FairbudsvsAudio Technica ATH-CKS50TW2vs
Audio Technica ATH-CKS50TW2vsradius Hear-scape Beethoven HP-B100BT