vs
3.8Battery3.0
7.7Build & features5.0
Why is ATH-CK1TW better than Redmi Buds 3 Pro?
- Battery life7 h vs 6 h+17%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
Why is Redmi Buds 3 Pro better than ATH-CK1TW?
- Earbud weight (each)6 g vs 4.9 g+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 4.9 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 25,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 6 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 28 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 35 mAh |
| Charging time | 3 h | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 6 g | 4.9 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Audio Technica ATH-CK1TWvsOPPO Enco Free26.05.4
vs
Audio Technica ATH-CK1TWvsradius Ne PROGRES HP-P100BT6.06.0
vs
Audio Technica ATH-CK1TWvsXiaomi MI True Wireless Earphones 26.05.8
vs
Audio Technica ATH-CK1TWvsEarFun Free 2S
vs
JLab Go Air SportvsXiaomi Redmi Buds 3 Pro5.45.2
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Buds 3 ProvsOPPO Enco Free25.25.4
