vs
3.8Battery2.4
Why is ATH-CK1TW better than VerveBuds 250?
- Battery life7 h vs 6 h+17%
Why is VerveBuds 250 better than ATH-CK1TW?
VerveBuds 250 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 4.9 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 25,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 6 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 15 h |
| Charging time | 3 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Alexa, Google Assistant, Siri |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 6 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
