How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. ATH-CC500BT2 vs Sonic

Audio Technica ATH-CC500BT2 vs Suunto Sonic

What ATH-CC500BT2 does better (1) and where Sonic wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Audio Technica ATH-CC500BT2
Audio Technica · 2024ATH-CC500BT2
6.2Score
1 advantage≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Suunto Sonic
Suunto · 2024Sonic
5.2Score
5 advantages≈ $130
9.0Battery6.0
3.5Build & features5.0

Why is ATH-CC500BT2 better than Sonic?

  1. Battery life20 h vs 10 h2×

Why is Sonic better than ATH-CC500BT2?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · ATH-CC500BT2: Yes
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
  3. Charging time2 h vs 1 h2×
  4. aptXNo · ATH-CC500BT2: Yes
  5. Weight32 g vs 31 g+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Suunto SonicSuunto Sonic≈ $1305.2
Sound
FitBone conductionBone conduction
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—6 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB117 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life20 h10 h
Charging time2 h1 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
Bluetooth codecsLC3, AAC, SBCaptX Adaptive, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoYes
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE AudioYes—
USB-CYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight32 g31 g
Protection ratingIPX4IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)—5
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare