vs
9.0Battery4.4
3.5Build & features3.3
Why is ATH-CC500BT2 better than Float Run WI-OE610?
- Battery life20 h vs 10 h2×
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5+6%
- Weight32 g vs 33 g+3%
- Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
Why is Float Run WI-OE610 better than ATH-CC500BT2?
Float Run WI-OE610 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Bone conduction | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Open-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 16 mm |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | 10 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LC3, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 32 g | 33 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
