How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. ATH-CC500BT2 vs OpenRun Mini USB-C

Audio Technica ATH-CC500BT2 vs Shokz OpenRun Mini USB-C

What ATH-CC500BT2 does better (3) and where OpenRun Mini USB-C wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Audio Technica ATH-CC500BT2
Audio Technica · 2024ATH-CC500BT2
6.2Score
3 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Shokz OpenRun Mini USB-C
Shokz · 2024OpenRun Mini USB-C
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ $110
9.0Battery5.0
3.5Build & features2.3

Why is ATH-CC500BT2 better than OpenRun Mini USB-C?

  1. Battery life20 h vs 10 h2×
  2. Weight32 g vs 380 g11.9×
  3. Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5.1+4%

Why is OpenRun Mini USB-C better than ATH-CC500BT2?

  1. Charging time2 h vs 1.5 h+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitBone conductionBone conduction
Ear cup design—Open-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Lowest frequency—21 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—8 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB4 dB
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life20 h10 h
Charging time2 h1.5 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.1
Bluetooth codecsLC3, AAC, SBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE AudioYes—
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Weight32 g380 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)—6
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare