How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. ATH-CC500BT2 vs Endurance Pace

Audio Technica ATH-CC500BT2 vs JBL Endurance Pace

What ATH-CC500BT2 does better (3) and where Endurance Pace wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Audio Technica ATH-CC500BT2
Audio Technica · 2024ATH-CC500BT2
6.2Score
3 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
vs
JBL Endurance Pace
JBL · 2025Endurance Pace
5.6Score
1 advantage≈ $75
9.0Battery4.7
3.5Build & features7.0

Why is ATH-CC500BT2 better than Endurance Pace?

  1. Battery life20 h vs 10 h2×
  2. Charging time2 h vs 4 h2×
  3. Weight32 g vs 33 g+3%

Why is Endurance Pace better than ATH-CC500BT2?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx7+75%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitBone conductionOpen-ear
Ear cup design—Open-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—18 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB104 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Microphones—2
Battery & charging
Battery life20 h10 h
Charging time2 h4 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.4
Bluetooth codecsLC3, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE AudioYes—
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Weight32 g33 g
Protection ratingIPX4—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx7
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare