vs
9.3Battery7.4
Why is ATH-CC500BT better than Tune 215BT?
- Battery life20 h vs 16 h+25%
Why is Tune 215BT better than ATH-CC500BT?
- Weight35 g vs 18 g+91%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Bone conduction | Neckband |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 20 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB | 118 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | 16 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 130 mAh |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 35 g | 18 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
