vs
9.0Battery4.7
2.8Build & features7.0
Why is ATH-CC500BT better than Endurance Pace?
- Battery life20 h vs 10 h2×
- Charging time2 h vs 4 h2×
Why is Endurance Pace better than ATH-CC500BT?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx7+75%
- Weight35 g vs 33 g+6%
- Bluetooth version5.1 vs 5.4+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Bone conduction | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Open-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 18 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB | 104 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | 10 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 4 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 35 g | 33 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx7 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
