vs
7.2Noise control & calls9.3
3.1Battery6.6
Why is ATH-ANC300TW better than Tune 130NC TWS?
- Earbud weight (each)7 g vs 11.4 g+63%
- Highest frequency25,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+25%
Why is Tune 130NC TWS better than ATH-ANC300TW?
- Battery life4.5 h vs 8 h+78%
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 25,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 14 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 106 dB | 103 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 4.5 h | 8 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 8 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 7 g | 11.4 g |
| Protection rating | IPX2 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
