How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. ATH-AL5NC vs Monitor III ANC

Audio Technica ATH-AL5NC vs Marshall Monitor III ANC

What ATH-AL5NC does better (5) and where Monitor III ANC wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Audio Technica ATH-AL5NC
Audio Technica · 2026ATH-AL5NC
9.1Score
5 advantages≈ $270
Higher score
vs
Marshall Monitor III ANC
Marshall · 2024Monitor III ANC
7.1Score
3 advantages≈ $270
9.2Noise control & calls7.8
7.9Battery8.2

Why is ATH-AL5NC better than Monitor III ANC?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Monitor III ANC: No
  2. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
  3. LDACYes · Monitor III ANC: No
  4. Weight240 g vs 250 g+4%
  5. Driver size53 mm vs 32 mm+66%

Why is Monitor III ANC better than ATH-AL5NC?

  1. Battery life75 h vs 100 h+33%
  2. Battery life with ANC50 h vs 70 h+40%
  3. Charging time3.5 h vs 3 h+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Fit—Over-ear
Ear cup designOpen-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size53 mm32 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance52 Ω46 Ω
Sensitivity103 dB92 dB
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life75 h100 h
Battery life with ANC50 h70 h
Charging time3.5 h3 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Wireless charging (case)—No
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXNoNo
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight240 g250 g
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx0
FoldableYesYes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare