vs
Why is AT-NSP300BT better than GravaStar Mars?
AT-NSP300BT has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is GravaStar Mars better than AT-NSP300BT?
- Battery life13 h vs 20 h+54%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx42×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | — | 20 W |
| Speaker channels | — | 1.0 |
| Channel count | — | 1 |
| Stereo | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 13 h | 20 h |
| Mains powered | — | No |
| Battery powered (portable) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 2,100 g |
| Width | — | 180 mm |
| Height | — | 190 mm |
| Depth | — | 201 mm |
| Protection rating | IPX2 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
| Light effects | — | Yes |
