How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. A38 vs Coda W

Audio Pro A38 vs KEF Coda W

What A38 does better (3) and where Coda W wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Audio Pro A38
Audio Pro · 2022A38
3 advantages≈ $860
vs
KEF Coda W
KEF · 2025Coda W
1 advantage≈ $970
Dimensions

Size comparison

A38Coda W
190 × 832210168 × 285268
A38Coda WDifference
Height832 mm285 mm+547 mm
Width190 mm168 mm+22 mm
Depth210 mm268 mm−58 mm
Weight7,500 g11,300 g−3,800 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is A38 better than Coda W?

  1. Weight7,500 g vs 11,300 g+51%
  2. Highest frequency25,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+25%
  3. Lowest frequency32 Hz vs 38 Hz+19%

Why is Coda W better than A38?

  1. Output power150 W vs 200 W+33%
Specifications

Side by side

KEF Coda WKEF Coda W≈ $970
Sound
Output power150 W200 W
Speaker channels—2.0
Channel count—2
Lowest frequency32 Hz38 Hz
Highest frequency25,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Stereo—Yes
Battery & charging
Mains poweredYesYes
Battery powered (portable)NoNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5.4
Bluetooth codecs—aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—Yes
LDAC—No
USB audio—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Optical inputYesYes
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
AirPlayYes—
Chromecast / Google CastYes—
MultiroomYes—
Voice assistant built inYes—
Design & build
Weight7,500 g11,300 g
Width190 mm168 mm
Height832 mm285 mm
Depth210 mm268 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare