vs
Why is MM-500 better than ATH-WB2022?
- Driver size90 mm vs 45 mm2×
- Highest frequency50,000 Hz vs 45,000 Hz+11%
Why is ATH-WB2022 better than MM-500?
ATH-WB2022 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | — |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Planar magnetic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 90 mm | 45 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 50,000 Hz | 45,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 18 Ω | 47 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 106 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 9 h |
| Charging time | — | 2.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 350 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
