How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. LCD-2 Classic Closed Back MAZE vs T5 (3rd Gen)

Audeze LCD-2 Classic Closed Back MAZE vs beyerdynamic T5 (3rd Gen)

What LCD-2 Classic Closed Back MAZE does better (0) and where T5 (3rd Gen) wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Audeze LCD-2 Classic Closed Back MAZE
0 advantages≈ $1,150
vs
beyerdynamic T5 (3rd Gen)
beyerdynamic · 2020T5 (3rd Gen)
2 advantages≈ $860
4.0Noise control & calls4.0

Why is LCD-2 Classic Closed Back MAZE better than T5 (3rd Gen)?

LCD-2 Classic Closed Back MAZE has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is T5 (3rd Gen) better than LCD-2 Classic Closed Back MAZE?

  1. Weight612 g vs 350 g+75%
  2. Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 5 Hz2×
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size106 mm—
Lowest frequency10 Hz5 Hz
Highest frequency50,000 Hz50,000 Hz
Impedance70 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity97 dB128 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Connectivity
WirelessNoNo
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight612 g350 g
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare