vs
3.2Battery2.9
Why is ORBITER II better than AMA92003?
- Battery life6 h vs 5 h+20%
- Charging time1 h vs 1.5 h+50%
Why is AMA92003 better than ORBITER II?
AMA92003 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 5 h |
| Total with charging case | 20 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 30 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 1 h | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 3.6 g |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
