vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
2.6Battery6.1
4.3Build & features2.8
Why is AirPods Pro better than WOOD HA-FW1000T?
- Earbud weight (each)5.4 g vs 7.8 g+44%
Why is WOOD HA-FW1000T better than AirPods Pro?
- Battery life5 h vs 9 h+80%
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 11 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 48,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5 h | 9 h |
| Charging time | — | 2.5 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.4 g | 7.8 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
