vs
2.0Noise control & calls5.2
8.3Battery6.0
Why is R50i better than Buds T200 Lite?
- Battery life10 h vs 7 h+43%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- aptXYes · Buds T200 Lite: No
Why is Buds T200 Lite better than R50i?
- Active noise cancellingNo · R50i: Yes
- Driver size10 mm vs 12.4 mm+24%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 12.4 mm |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Microphones | 2 | 2 |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 48 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX | AAC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
