vs
2.0Noise control & calls3.0
Why is R50i better than TAE1209BK/00?
- Battery life10 h vs 8 h+25%
- aptXYes · TAE1209BK/00: No
- Driver size10 mm vs 8.6 mm+16%
Why is TAE1209BK/00 better than R50i?
TAE1209BK/00 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 102 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Microphones | 2 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 8 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx5 |
| Colours | — | White, Black |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
