vs
2.0Noise control & calls3.1
8.3Battery8.6
Why is R50i better than Enco Buds3 Pro?
- Charging time1.5 h vs 4 h2.7×
- aptXYes · Enco Buds3 Pro: No
Why is Enco Buds3 Pro better than R50i?
- Battery life10 h vs 12 h+20%
- Driver size10 mm vs 12.4 mm+24%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 12.4 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Sensitivity | — | 114 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Microphones | 2 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 12 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 54 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 58 mAh |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 4 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 4.3 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
