Why is R50i better than TWE-48?
- Battery life10 h vs 6 h+67%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 6 h4×
Why is TWE-48 better than R50i?
TWE-48 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 4 |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 48 Ω |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Microphones | 2 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 6 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 30 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 200 mAh |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 6 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IPX5 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
