vs
5.8Battery8.6
9.3Build & features7.0
Why is Aeroclip 2 better than OpenFit 2+ T921?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · OpenFit 2+ T921: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx5+40%
- LDACYes · OpenFit 2+ T921: No
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%
- Earbud weight (each)6.2 g vs 9.4 g+52%
Why is OpenFit 2+ T921 better than Aeroclip 2?
- Battery life8 h vs 11 h+38%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 12 mm | — |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Microphones | 4 | — |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 11 h |
| Total with charging case | 32 h | — |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 10 min → 4 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 6.2 g | 9.4 g |
| Protection rating | IP57 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | 5 |
| Colours | Burgundy Red, Mist Blue, Midnight Black, Cloud White | OpenFit 2+ Black, OpenFit 2+ Grey, OpenFit 2+ Purple |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Anker Aeroclip 2vsShokz OpenDots 26.87.4vs
Anker Aeroclip 2vsHuawei FreeClip 2 S6.87.3vs
Anker Aeroclip 2vsXiaomi Mijia Smart Audio Glasses6.87.2vs
Anker Aeroclip 2vsLG xboom Buds Plus by will.i.am6.86.8
vs
Huawei FreeClip 2vsShokz OpenFit 2+ T9218.68.9
vsHuawei FreeBuds Pro 5vsShokz OpenFit 2+ T9219.28.9