vs
4.4Noise control & calls7.2
5.8Battery8.9
9.3Build & features3.9
Why is Aeroclip 2 better than GLASS Core KH-CRZ90T?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
- Driver size12 mm vs 10 mm+20%
Why is GLASS Core KH-CRZ90T better than Aeroclip 2?
- Battery life8 h vs 17 h2.1×
- Active noise cancellingNo · Aeroclip 2: Yes
- Earbud weight (each)6.2 g vs 5.8 g+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 12 mm | 10 mm |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Microphones | 4 | — |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 17 h |
| Total with charging case | 32 h | — |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 10 min → 4 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 6.2 g | 5.8 g |
| Protection rating | IP57 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Colours | Burgundy Red, Mist Blue, Midnight Black, Cloud White | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Anker Aeroclip 2vsShokz OpenDots 26.87.4vs
Anker Aeroclip 2vsHuawei FreeClip 2 S6.87.3vs
Anker Aeroclip 2vsXiaomi Mijia Smart Audio Glasses6.87.2vs
Anker Aeroclip 2vsLG xboom Buds Plus by will.i.am6.86.8
vs
Huawei FreeClip 2vsKenwood GLASS Core KH-CRZ90T8.67.8vsShokz OpenDots 2vsKenwood GLASS Core KH-CRZ90T7.47.8