Why is N9 Hybrid better than VMH-D1?
- Active noise cancellingYes · VMH-D1: No
- Charging time3 h vs 5 h+67%
Why is VMH-D1 better than N9 Hybrid?
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 5 Hz4×
- Driver size40 mm vs 50 mm+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 50 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB | 100 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 100 h | — |
| Battery life with ANC | 55 h | — |
| Charging time | 3 h | 5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | Yes | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 281 g | 285 g |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
