How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. N9 Hybrid vs NTH-100M

AKG N9 Hybrid vs Rode NTH-100M

What N9 Hybrid does better (2) and where NTH-100M wins (1) — every spec side by side.

AKG N9 Hybrid
AKG · 2024N9 Hybrid
9.0Score
2 advantages≈ $160
Higher score
vs
Rode NTH-100M
Rode · 2023NTH-100M
1 advantage≈ $170
7.9Noise control & calls3.9

Why is N9 Hybrid better than NTH-100M?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · NTH-100M: No
  2. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 35,000 Hz+14%

Why is NTH-100M better than N9 Hybrid?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 5 Hz4×
Specifications

Side by side

AKG N9 HybridAKG N9 Hybrid≈ $1609.0
Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz5 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz35,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity98 dB110 dB
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life100 h—
Battery life with ANC55 h—
Charging time3 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesNo
Bluetooth version5.3—
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXNo—
LDACYes—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight281 g—
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare