How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Butterfly Neo HPB-SW20 vs TAA5608BK/00

Aiwa Butterfly Neo HPB-SW20 vs Philips TAA5608BK/00

What Butterfly Neo HPB-SW20 does better (4) and where TAA5608BK/00 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Aiwa Butterfly Neo HPB-SW20
4 advantages≈ $25
vs
Philips TAA5608BK/00
Philips · 2023TAA5608BK/00
0 advantages≈ $30
3.3Battery2.3

Why is Butterfly Neo HPB-SW20 better than TAA5608BK/00?

  1. Battery life8 h vs 6 h+33%
  2. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 130 Hz6.5×
  3. Charging time2 h vs 6 h3×
  4. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 16,000 Hz+25%

Why is TAA5608BK/00 better than Butterfly Neo HPB-SW20?

TAA5608BK/00 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOpen-earBone conduction
Ear cup designOpen-backOpen-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size34 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz130 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz16,000 Hz
Impedance11 Ω8 Ω
Sensitivity80 dB88 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Microphones—2
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h6 h
Charging time2 h6 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCLC3, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE Audio—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Design & build
Weight60 g—
Protection rating—IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx5
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare