vs
3.3Battery8.0
Why is Butterfly Neo HPB-SW20 better than TUNE 125BT?
- Driver size34 mm vs 8.6 mm4×
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is TUNE 125BT better than Butterfly Neo HPB-SW20?
- Battery life8 h vs 16 h2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | — |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 34 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 11 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 80 dB | 96 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 16 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 60 g | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
