vs
3.3Battery9.6
Why is Butterfly Neo HPB-SW20 better than ED-W280NBPRO?
Butterfly Neo HPB-SW20 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is ED-W280NBPRO better than Butterfly Neo HPB-SW20?
- Battery life8 h vs 23 h2.9×
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · Butterfly Neo HPB-SW20: Yes
- Weight60 g vs 32 g+88%
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
- LDACNo · Butterfly Neo HPB-SW20: Yes
- Charging time2 h vs 1.5 h+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | — |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 34 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 11 Ω | 24 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 80 dB | 92 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 23 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LDAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 60 g | 32 g |
| Protection rating | — | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
