Why is H200 better than N9 Hybrid?
- Lowest frequency2 Hz vs 20 Hz10×
Why is N9 Hybrid better than H200?
- Active noise cancellingNo · H200: Yes
- Highest frequency23,500 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+70%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 2 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 23,500 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB | 98 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 100 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 55 h |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 281 g |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
